<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Developers: Don’t Be Password Idiots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a Doozy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harsha M V</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-436763</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsha M V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-436763</guid>
		<description>nice article.. i agree we need to add salt to the hashes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article.. i agree we need to add salt to the hashes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krumpet</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-415530</link>
		<dc:creator>Krumpet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-415530</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I use some sites that have the most ridiculous password rules (Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney, I&#039;m looking at BOTH of you). It&#039;s like their devs never bothered to think at all. Frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I use some sites that have the most ridiculous password rules (Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney, I&#8217;m looking at BOTH of you). It&#8217;s like their devs never bothered to think at all. Frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384513</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384513</guid>
		<description>Also, OpenID is the solution to this stuff.  We all should be using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, OpenID is the solution to this stuff.  We all should be using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384512</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384512</guid>
		<description>Key thing about the type of characters input into a form is for server protection.  Sure, you might be storing it as a hash or something, but I think the aim is to avoid people inputing binary/shell active code into a form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key thing about the type of characters input into a form is for server protection.  Sure, you might be storing it as a hash or something, but I think the aim is to avoid people inputing binary/shell active code into a form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBoden</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384508</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBoden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384508</guid>
		<description>I just had to deal with the same idiocy on paypals development site. They forced me to use at lease one upper letter character in my password, even though i had underscores included.

That was where it hit me, that I&#039;d much rather have them generate my password as a user, then spend time making a new one for their site alone, not to mention writing it down afterwards.

It would be cool as a second option, if you must have these ridiculous &quot;security&quot; features.


The most annoying &quot;security&quot; feature, is the secret question. I almost always just hit in a bunch of random characters on those. REALLY, secret question should be optional, not required!!


But its no worse then pointless CAPTCHA&#039;s, like the one found on this blog, design your own CAPTCHA system damn it, and only throw them out when a visitors behaviour reassembles that of a bot.

The &quot;stop spam. read books.&quot; CAPTCHA is paticuler useless, and should be avoided at all costs. In that it fails about 70% of the time, and annoys users. And in that its effectively digitalizing books, and not giving people anything in return for their efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to deal with the same idiocy on paypals development site. They forced me to use at lease one upper letter character in my password, even though i had underscores included.</p>
<p>That was where it hit me, that I&#8217;d much rather have them generate my password as a user, then spend time making a new one for their site alone, not to mention writing it down afterwards.</p>
<p>It would be cool as a second option, if you must have these ridiculous &#8220;security&#8221; features.</p>
<p>The most annoying &#8220;security&#8221; feature, is the secret question. I almost always just hit in a bunch of random characters on those. REALLY, secret question should be optional, not required!!</p>
<p>But its no worse then pointless CAPTCHA&#8217;s, like the one found on this blog, design your own CAPTCHA system damn it, and only throw them out when a visitors behaviour reassembles that of a bot.</p>
<p>The &#8220;stop spam. read books.&#8221; CAPTCHA is paticuler useless, and should be avoided at all costs. In that it fails about 70% of the time, and annoys users. And in that its effectively digitalizing books, and not giving people anything in return for their efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan F</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384481</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384481</guid>
		<description>Nice article, but here is another idea: Even 4 characters may provides sufficient security if used with a max amount of wrong attempts - throttling down the number of brute force attempts from 1,000 per second to 5 per day makes a considerable difference in you table ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but here is another idea: Even 4 characters may provides sufficient security if used with a max amount of wrong attempts &#8211; throttling down the number of brute force attempts from 1,000 per second to 5 per day makes a considerable difference in you table ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan&#8217;s World &#187; LINKBLOG for June 23, 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384279</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan&#8217;s World &#187; LINKBLOG for June 23, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384279</guid>
		<description>[...] Web Developers: Don’t Be Password Idiots - Ian Some important tips for implementing a password scheme on your website [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Developers: Don’t Be Password Idiots &#8211; Ian Some important tips for implementing a password scheme on your website [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.isnoop.net/2009/06/22/web-developers-don%e2%80%99t-be-password-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-384196</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isnoop.net/?p=319#comment-384196</guid>
		<description>#6: Salt your hashes.  For the love of jeebus, use salt.  I don&#039;t care what your blood pressure is, throw some salt on your hashes right here and right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6: Salt your hashes.  For the love of jeebus, use salt.  I don&#8217;t care what your blood pressure is, throw some salt on your hashes right here and right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
